Ongoing review of budgets impacts profitability.
Most
companies today use ratio comparatives to discover strengths and
weaknesses. However, these are only
tools to measure performance, not remedies to financial problems. It is the use to which you put these ratios
that will determine their real value.
One
important usage of financial ratios is for profit planning or “budgeting for
profits.” Ideally, budgets that are
prepared annually should undergo regular review throughout the budget year to
determine that the company remains on course.
Good budgeting involves a “profit objective” — a bottom-up approach whereby the company
determines the desired profitability level and budgets expenses accordingly —
and if reviews are planned regularly, any significant variances can result in
rapid modifications for the remainder of the period in order to maximize
profits.
In addition
to the participation and cooperation on the part of the various managers who
exercise control over their revenue or cost areas, the company’s annual budget process
should give considerable attention to setting company norms that are at least
equal to those prevailing in the industry.
These standards are found in the annual ASA Operating Performance Report.
Companies
that participate in ASA’s Operating Performance Report receive details of
survey results in primary business segments in all the PHCP and PVF
industries. Within each segment, data is shown for all participating
firms, as well as by sales volume size and a special analysis that focuses on
high profit firms is included. Each report also includes a 20-year trend
report for each business segment.
Participation is still open for the 2008 ASA Operating
Performance Report.
Please
contact Chris Murin at 312-464-0090 x205 or cmurin@asa.net for more information.