Supply House Times
  Home
  Subscribe
  Blogs
  Subscription Customer Service
  Updates
  Today's Top News
  Calendar of Events
  PVF E-News Archives
  Latest News
  Milestones
  Events Photo Gallery
  Web Exclusives
  Current Issue
  Cover Story
  Features
  Columns
  Products
  Industry News
  ASA News
  Industrial PVF News
  Bath and Kitchen News
  Resources
  myPlumbingPortal
  Premier 150
  Water Info Library
  AEC Store
  Archives
  Digital Edition Archive
  Free Product Info
  Ad Index
  B.I.G. Book
  Manufacturers' Rep Locator Directory
  Digital Radiant Flooring Guide
  Classified Ads
  Industry Links
  Market Research
  Showrooms
  Webinars
  Video Archive
  Special Collections
  Economics Week in Review
  Supply HT Info
  Contact Us
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
DPHA Comments On DOE Showerhead Definition

June 11, 2010

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



In a message to members, John Hausoul, executive director of the Decorative Plumbing and Hardware Association, said: "...the Department of Energy (DOE) has proposed a rule to reclassify a showerhead. This change could have a dramatic impact on the concept of luxury and prevent many shower applications from being sold since the water usage would exceed the 2.5 gpm max. DPHA has not engaged in legislative affairs in the past, but as the industry's most active trade association, this is an issue that we could not ignore."

To ensure an efficient and prompt response, DPHA coordinated with the Plumbing Manufacturers Institute (PMI), and with their permission, incorporated their comments.

DPHA said it is “greatly concerned about DOE’s intentions to move forward and develop a completely new definition of showerhead without regard to its impact on plumbing manufacturers, suppliers, contractors and the general public.”

DPHA’s comments addressed the following issues:

  • DOE’s showerhead “interpretive” rule must be subject to APA rulemaking procedures (notice-and-comment rulemaking procedures set forth in the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). 5 U.S.C. § 553).
  •  
  • DOE’s redefinition disregards important technical distinctions between a showerhead and a shower valve.

  • DOE’s interpretation fails to account for water efficiency and costs to school systems and health care institutions.

  • DOE's water efficiency focus is misplaced. The current DOE action will either eliminate or dramatically increase the costs to aging Americans who depend upon dual hand and overhead showers as a necessity.
DPHA


Links

|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.

























BNP Media
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy