As both an industry product
observer and a guy who has done considerable design work in the field, it has
been interesting to follow the puzzling story of instant hot water systems. The
fact that I find it necessary to even explain the term to some of my readers
underscores my befuddlement as to why this super-utility product hasn't seen a higher
level of sales success. And if you are one who doesn't know what I am talking
about (thus proving my point), instant hot water dispensers are point-of-use
products that are typically installed on the kitchen sink, consisting of an
electrically heated storage tank below that feeds a dedicated delivery device
above.
Unlike what we more commonly refer
to as hot water supply in the home (with typical delivery in the 120°F to 140°F range), these systems deliver at near-boiling
temperatures (190°F+). The super-heated water they provide is ideal for instant
beverages, soups, hot cereals, pastas, thawing frozen foods, loosening baked-on
crud, etc. (Note: though the term
instant
hot is often used in a rather generic way for such systems, technically,
that is a registered trademark of KitchenAid - it has become a Kleenex kind of
term in our biz.)
When these products came onto the
scene back in the late 60's and early 70's, there was a lot of excitement that
they would become "the next garbage disposer" in terms of standard
equipment on the sink. It never happened. Why this is so isn't entirely clear,
but one thing is - it hasn't been because the products haven't delivered on
their promise of utility and convenience. When you talk to folks who do have
one installed in their home, you will usually get a very positive review,
including, "I wouldn't have another kitchen without one." Interestingly,
I often get those remarks from someone who didn't intentionally select one, but
rather, inherited one with the purchase of a home.
I sometimes hear arguments against
hot taps based on the availability of microwave ovens in most kitchens today. Sorry,
but that's not
instant.
While getting a hot beverage ready to go in two or three minutes may have
sounded good a generation ago, folks today aren't as willing to wait for things
to happen. And for those who may think that nuking water is safer than using a
hot tap, there are growing reports of boiling water flashing up out of
containers
after removal
from the oven. See these reports that Mario found online recently:
http://www.alive.com/3833a2a2.php?subject_bread_cramb=449http://www.instructables.com/id/Hidden-Danger-MicrowaveProbably the biggest misconception about hot taps is their
energy use. With all the green concern these days, this would seem to be a drag
on their acceptance. But here again, the facts tell a different story. The
energy consumed by the average two quart system is about the same as operating
a 40-watt lightbulb. In fact, one manufacturer claims that boiling water on an
electric range consumes more energy than a hot tap that is always on.
So what's the problem here? Why is this category still stuck
well below the million mark in annual unit sales, when disposer numbers are up
there in the eight-figure neighborhood with kitchen sinks and faucets?
One obvious factor is lack of exposure. It amazes me
how often I meet people - even industry people - who still don't know there is such
a thing as an instant hot. In asking manufacturers about this over the years, I
sometimes get an explanation that goes something like this: "Well, the
category isn't a big one for us compared to our core product lines, so we only
devote a proportional amount to our advertising budget." Anybody see
something wrong with that picture?
If there is anything to be encouraged about in recent years,
it has been the consumer response to more upscale designs in the dispensing heads
offered with such systems. From the beginning, initial offerings of instant
hots were either large plasticky-looking faucets with steroid-inspired styling
(above), or in the case of goose-neck models (right), something that looked
like it belonged on the factory water cooler (probably because that's where it
came from).
Though there were minor refinements to these constructions
over the years, the first truly upscale dispensing head was designed by my firm
for Franke back in the late 80's. Dubbed the "Little Butler," this
was the first all-brass design with decorative styling and available in a
variety of finishes. The success of this introduction then triggered numerous
designs using similar constructions from other manufacturers, for the most part
using vertically oriented actuating levers.
I might add that as sales for these upscale models grew,
there has been a definite swing from "hot only" to hot
and cold models. Cold, in this
case, can mean several things - cold, as in ambient cold (same thing you get
from the primary faucet on the sink) - chilled (coming from an under-counter
chiller) - or either of those combined with a filter.
Next on the upscale scene came even more designs appealing
to the consumer, in this case, looking more like decorative bar faucets. These
models also brought us improved valving, in the form of ceramic
cartridges.
(The servicing of many of the vertical lever designs often requires the
dexterity of a puzzle expert and a third hand, by the way.) One drawback of the hot and cold models of
this genre, however, has been their lengthy linear footprint on the faucet
deck, sometimes causing interference with other components.
Links