|
|
| A new generation of shower products from Hansgrohe |
|
During
my swing through the ISH Fair in Frankfurt this Spring, I spent quite a bit of
time in the Hansgrohe booth, and while there, looked at surface-mount shower installations
with new eyes. They are basically the same as they have always been — with
one significant difference. To back up a bit here, one of the things that
Europeans have always accepted — but we have not — is the use of a handshower
as the only means of water delivery — even though it was most often offered
with a way to hang it on the wall for hands free showering. I guess we thought
this looked too much like an RV installation. The prevailing attitude here
seems to have been, "Hey, we like having that handheld thingy as a
secondary showering device, but we love our main showerheads fixed to the wall
(and if you can make that sucker 12" or more in diameter, all the
better)."
What struck
me in the Hansgrohe booth (and they are not alone in this, by any means) is a
new generation of shower products that provides both a fixed showerhead, and a
handheld attachment. With this combination, the supply to the showerhead isn't
just a utilitarian-looking exposed pipe, it doubles as the slide rail for the
hand shower as well as the parking place for other accessories.
But if we
can provide all that with concealed valve installations (assuming we include a
conventional slide rail for the handshower), what's the advantage? Glad
you asked. I see big advantages when it comes to installation. Not
having to run piping to the tub filler and shower behind the wall is one. And
since the tub spout is typically integrated with the valve body on European
shower valves, there is no piping to that component period. Next, let's look at
servicing. Changing out a valve cartridge may be pretty much the same with
both types, but on a concealed installation, what happens if you have a defective
valve body that leaks?
In
this case, you are talking about the potential of damage that could go
undetected until it reaches disaster stage -- followed by having to tear into
the wall to replace the valve body. But on the other hand, if a body leak
develops in an external-mount valve,
(1) you see it right
away,
(2) it doesn't cause any damage, and
(3)
you can replace it in minutes.
I think
it's time to reconsider the European approach here. What do you think?
Write me
at:
donarnold@earthlink.net