Supply House Times
  Home
  Subscribe
  myPlumbing Portal.com
  Benfield's Blog
  Updates
  Today's Top News
  Calendar of Events
  PVF E-News Archives
  Latest News
  Current Issue
  Cover Story
  Features
  Columns
  Products
  Industry News
  ASA News
  Industrial PVF News
  Bath and Kitchen News
  HVACR and Hydronics News
  Technology News
  Resources
  Premier 150
  Water Info Library
  AEC Store
  Archives
  Free Product Info
  Ad Index
  Buyers Guide
  Classified Ads
  Industry Links
  Market Research
  Showrooms
  Webinars
  Video Archive
  Supply HT Info
  Special Collections
  Economics Week in Review
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
PEX Makers Win Lawsuit Vs. California


February 2, 2003

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Dzintra Janavs, in response to a lawsuit filed by the Plastic Pipe and Fittings Association against the California Building Standards Commission and other state agencies, ordered the inclusion of PEX plastic pipe into the California Plumbing Code. The judge agreed that the state agencies had acted in an "arbitrary and capricious" manner in excluding PEX from the state's plumbing code.

The suit was filed on behalf of PEX pipe manufacturers and PPFA members Vanguard Industries, Uponor Wirsbo and Zurn PEX Plumbing and Radiant Heating Systems (formerly Qest Hydronics). It sought to overturn California's adoption of an updated plumbing code on May 2, 2002, which deleted PEX from the code pending an environmental review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act.

In a decision handed down in late December, the judge found that the California Environmental Quality Act could not be used to exclude PEX because PEX is a "product" and not a "project" under state law.

But the industry isn't out of the woods yet. There is potential for an appeal by the building commission and the five state agencies that advise it on code adoption - the Department of Housing and Community Development, the Division of the State Architect, the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, the Department of Health Services and the Department of Food and Agriculture.

There is no indication at this time that they will appeal the ruling, said Dick Church, executive director of the PPFA.

The California Department of Housing and Community Development's Chief Counsel Richard Friedman said that no appeal decision has been made yet. The agencies have 60 days from the official judgement to file an appeal.




Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.



















BNP Media
© 2008 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy