Supply House Times
  Home
  Subscribe
  Blogs
  Subscription Customer Service
  Updates
  Today's Top News
  Calendar of Events
  PVF E-News Archives
  Latest News
  Milestones
  Events Photo Gallery
  Web Exclusives
  Current Issue
  Cover Story
  Features
  Columns
  Products
  Industry News
  ASA News
  Industrial PVF News
  Bath and Kitchen News
  Resources
  myPlumbingPortal
  Premier 150
  Water Info Library
  AEC Store
  Archives
  Digital Edition Archive
  Free Product Info
  Ad Index
  B.I.G. Book
  Manufacturers' Rep Locator Directory
  Digital Radiant Flooring Guide
  Classified Ads
  Industry Links
  Market Research
  Showrooms
  Webinars
  Video Archive
  Special Collections
  Economics Week in Review
  Supply HT Info
  Contact Us
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
U.S. Senator Weighs In On Showerheads

July 28, 2010

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



The following is a letter written to the Department of Energy from Senator Scott Brown of Massachusetts on behalf of Steven Conneen, showroom manager at Snow and Jones Co., as well as the industry and the U.S. consumer in regards to the growing showerhead debate.  


Department of Energy
Elizabeth Nolan
Forrestal Building Rm. 7B138
1000 Independence Ave. SW
Washington D.C. 20585

July 21, 2010

Re: Steven Conneen

Dear Ms. Nolan:

I am writing on behalf of Steven Conneen, a constituent of mine from Weymouth, Massachusetts. Mr. Conneen has been in contact with my office regarding the redefinition of the term shower head (Docket #EERE-2010-BT-NOA-0016).

In May, the Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy solicited comments on the agency’s drafter rule to amend the definition of the term “showerhead” (Federal Register-5/19/10-Volume 75, Number 96, Page 27926). Mr. Conneen has researched the DOE proposal and is an experienced manager in the plumbing industry.

This DOE proposal would significantly impact the use of various types of showering systems in homes across America, including hand-held showers, body sprays, and shower systems. Such systems are even used in hospitals, nursing homes, and schools. Placing restrictions on these shower systems would severely damage plumbing manufacturers, contractors, installers, retailers, and consumers across the country.

What concerns Mr. Conneen most is the process being used to implement this proposal. A change of this magnitude should not be exempt from the notice and comment requirements of the Administrative Procedures Act as the Department of Energy has asserted. Holding only a brief 30-day comment period, DOE’s proposed “interpretive” rule would negate the standard definition of a showerhead that has existed for years.

Finally, this proposal may eliminate the ability of consumers to choose which type of shower system they would like to purchase. While I understand that the efficient and sustainable use of water is an issue of the utmost importance, I ask you to consider the impact this current proposal will have on the American public and reexamine your decision to redefine the showerhead rule.

Any assistance or consideration you are able to render would be greatly appreciated.

Please keep me informed of the progress of this case. For additional information questions, please do not hesitate to contact my aide, Erika Paulhus.
Thank you again for your attention in this matter.


Sincerely,
Scott P. Brown
United States Senator

2400 John F. Kennedy Federal Building
Government Center
Boston, Massachusetts 02203
SPB/elp


|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.

























BNP Media
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy