With the plumbing industry showing widespread disapproval of
the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) proposed re-definition of showerheads as
shower valves, the legislative body recently clarified a number of points in an
e-mail exchange with
Plumbing
& Mechanical.
As reported earlier this month by Editor
Jim Olsztynski, the re-definition would
allow only a single showerhead using no more than 2.5 gallons per minute of
water per showering compartment — a move that would effectively ban multiple
outlet shower systems.
DOE Spokeswoman
Jen Stutsman
said the interpretation change came about after the DOE had received several
complaints alleging certain showerhead products exceeded the federal water-conservation
standard.
“In the course of investigating these
complaints, DOE discovered some confusion as to how the Department’s definition
of “showerhead” for water conservation purposes applied to new showerhead
designs being marketed under names such as waterfalls, shower towers, rainheads
and shower systems,” Stutsman said.
“Under (the) Energy Policy and
Conservation Act (EPCA) and DOE’s regulations, the current definition is:
“Showerhead means any showerhead (including a hand-held showerhead), except a
safety shower showerhead.”
Plumbing industry executives were
baffled originally by the way the new definition interpretation was presented,
essentially buried amid other directives in the Federal Register. No notice was
given to stakeholders about the proposed change. Several plumbing contractors
contacted by
Plumbing &
Mechanical were also unaware of the proposal or had heard
extremely vague information on it.
“It’s frustrating that there wasn’t an
attempt to reach out to key stakeholders on this,” Plumbing Manufacturers
Institute Executive Director
Barbara Higgens said. “We
almost missed it and that’s the scary thing. It’s not a good situation.”
Stutsman said if the new definition is
put into law, it would not outright ban multiple showerheads.
“The draft interpretation would not ban
the use of multiple showerhead products, such as a hand nozzle and fixed
nozzle,” she said. “Rather, it makes clear that the full range of available
showerhead products, including products with a hand nozzle and fixed nozzle,
must meet the federal water-conservation standard on the books since 1998 — 2.5
gallons per minute at 80 pounds per square inch.”
The comments period on the draft
interpretation ends on Friday after originally being slated to end June 6.
“We have received a number of comments
providing feedback on the draft interpretative rule from the industry and the
public,” Stutsman said.
“Once we have had a chance to review the
comments, we intend to issue a final interpretive rule to clarify the
definition of “showerhead” as used in our rules. As we proceed, we will be
mindful of manufacturers’ production decisions that may have been based on a
misunderstanding of the definition of the term showerhead and how it related to
the Department’s conservation standards.”
With potential ramifications to manufacturers,
plumbing contractors, consumers and commercial property owners alike, plumbing
industry executives are wondering why the different constituencies can’t come
together to discuss the situation in the immediate future.
“We’re hoping that when we present our
notes that maybe they will say they will look at it a little more before making
a decision,” Hansgrohe President
Russ Wheeler said.
“I wish we as a group could all work
together on this,” Higgens said.
Keep checking BNP Media’s Plumbing Group
Web sites at
www.SupplyHT.com,
www.PMmag.com,
www.PMEngineer.com and
www.bathandkitchenpro.com as well as the July 2010
issue of
Plumbing &
Mechanical for the latest on this developing story.